|
Search the archives: |
From: "Steve Clarke" <sclarke@teleport.com> Subject: Re: 1.5" vs 1.75" SU's Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 13:09:36 -0700RE: 1.5" vs 1.75" SU's Try this link for a view of the SSS setup with 38's.-Steve----- Original Message -----From: c_mccroskey@twtus.comSent: Friday, May 05, 2000 9:39 AMSubject: RE: 1.5" vs 1.75" SU'sDoes anybody want to send pics of their SU linkage rig-ups?
-Carl-----Original Message-----
From: CEGARRA@aol.com [mailto:CEGARRA@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 10:08 AM
To: martin@qnx.com; kwhcpa@addler.net
Cc: bluebirds@bluebirds.datsun510.com
Subject: Re: 1.5" vs 1.75" SU's
<<
|
| The 46's are very easy to come by, at least around here.... the
| 240Z's had just the carb on 'em. You might have some issues with
| the linkage and whatnot, and maybe throttle plate rotation (but I
| think that's 2000 Roadster carbs). Julian's page might have
| info? I think the DQ classifieds lists a few sets for sale...
Do the throttle plates rotate in the opposite direction? That would be a
pain. Although a good excuse to convert to a cable I guess.
>>
The Roadsters throttle rotation is the same as the 38mm SU's. It's the Z car
SU's that rotate in the opposite direction. But linkage isn't a problem,
nothing a brazing rod, hacksaw and torch can't create. My linkage works quite
well. I did almost go to cable but thought I'd go mechanical first.Lou
This message comes to you from the Datsun 510 mailing list.
List rules and instructions are available at:
http://bluebirds.datsun510.com/bluebirds/listcharter
Authors retain implicit copyright to their material. Obtain
permission from the author before redistributing messages.
